US Vs Economy
I was reading an economical article written by Jim Jubak whose the senior markets editor for MSN Money. However, I was impressed by that article which was wrote June 5, 2007 about U.S. economical future. He stated several points including worst case scenario and if those oil producers would use this energy power in a political way. Anyhow, here is some of the interesting parts of this article.
“Fed ain’t what it used to be
Remember the good ol’ days? Back when the U.S. Federal Reserve and its chairman were in charge of our economy? The Fed would try to find a delicate balance in setting interest rates: High enough to control inflation and low enough to encourage economic growth. Once upon a time, those policy changes were actually the most important decisions anyone made about the U.S. economy.
By the Fed’s own admission, the growth of global liquidity has reduced the U.S. central bank’s ability to control interest rates — and thus the economy — in the United States. Think about this: The Fed raises short-term interest rates relentlessly from their 1% low in June 2003, and yet long-term rates sink as global cash flows overwhelm the Fed’s domestic policy shifts.
Still, the U.S. stock and bond markets hang on the Federal Reserve’s every word. Just last week the stock market rallied on the release of minutes from the Fed’s rate-setting body, the Open Market Committee.
How quaint. Investors would be better off parsing the comments of Saudi oil minister Ali Naimi.
Saudi have the clout
It’s now Saudi Arabia that’s trying to find a delicate balance. In the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), the Saudis are the swing producer — the only major oil producer with enough extra production capacity to increase supply when the price of a barrel of crude soars, and the only major oil producer with the political will and foresight to cut supply when prices fall too low. Right now, the Saudis are producing at 8.5 million barrels a day. Depending on whose figures you believe, their production capacity is anywhere from 9 million to 11 million barrels a day.
If the Saudis allow oil prices to climb too high, then consumers will cut back on use, and energy alternatives will become sufficiently attractive to investors to cut into oil’s share of the global energy market. Worst case: Oil prices will climb so high that they cause a global recession that will certainly cut demand.
If the Saudis allow oil prices to fall too much, they will reduce the revenue they get for oil and reduce their clout among those oil-producing countries that are only willing to follow the Saudi lead as long as it lines their pockets. Worst case: Revenue falls so far that the Saudis and other oil-producing countries don’t have the cash to support their own plans for growing their economies and providing the jobs and subsidies that keep many oil-country governments in power.
An oil-thirsty world
One source of Saudi Arabia’s economic clout lies in the galloping global — and U.S. — demand for oil. The U.S. Energy Information Administration forecasts that total world demand for petroleum will reach 118 million barrels a day in 2030, up from 83 million barrels a day in 2004.
It wouldn’t matter if the world was awash in oil right now or if finding new reserves of oil hadn’t become so difficult and expensive. Oil supply right now is at 83 million barrels a day, the Energy Information Administration calculates, about even with demand. To meet projected demand, oil supply will have to grow by about 33% from 2004 to 2030. That’s a huge increase since, according to the agency, oil production in non-OPEC countries will be flat in the period and falling in such current big suppliers as Mexico and Venezuela.
Only if OPEC increases its production by 14 million barrels a day by 2030 will global supply match global demand. And the biggest chunk of that extra production will have to come from Saudi Arabia, where the Energy Information Administration is projecting an increase in production to 16.4 million barrels a day in 2030 from 11 million barrels a day now. That’s roughly a 50% increase.
Demand, prices both rise
The other source of Saudi economic clout derives from the fact that the world is so hooked on oil — so crucial to development in emerging economies — that demand for oil goes up even as oil prices rise. In 2006, oil industry analysts calculate, global oil demand grew at a rate of 800,000 barrels a day. When oil is less expensive, as it looks likely to be in 2007 when the average price per barrel is forecast at closer to $62 than to 2006′s average of $66, demand grows even faster. In 2007, growth in global demand is forecast at 1.3 million barrels a day.
The U.S. economy is no exception. Total oil imports into the United States jumped by 14% in March from February to hit record levels. And even as gasoline prices soar in the United States, consumption growth continues. U.S. gasoline demand in May was up about 1% from May 2006.
How much clout does that give the Saudis over the U.S. economy? The United States imports about two-thirds of its oil at a cost of about $300 billion a year. According to a study by the Rand Corp., each $10 increase in the cost of a barrel costs the average American household $700 a year.
Oil up, GDP growth down
In January 2004, the price of oil was $34.27 a barrel, according to the St. Louis Federal Reserve. It closed at $65.08 on June 1, 2007. Using Rand’s numbers, that’s an increase of $2,156 per household for oil. In that same period — when the Federal Reserve’s short-term interest rate increases pushed the yield on the 10-year Treasury note to 4.95% from 4.30% — U.S. Gross Domestic Product growth dropped from 3.9% in 2004 to 3.2% in 2005, 3.3% in 2006 and to 0.6% in the first quarter of 2007. I certainly can’t tease out the effects of higher oil prices from the effects of higher interest rates, but my suspicion is that the former has had a bigger effect on the U.S. economy in this period than the latter, thanks to the continued availability of cheap money from global sources such as Japan.
Saudi Arabia has no interest in killing the U.S. or the global golden goose. Sending our economy or, worse yet, the global economy into a recession, or even quarter after quarter of growth below 2%, would wreak havoc with Saudi revenues.”
I was impressed when I read between these line “Worst case: Oil prices will climb so high that they cause a global recession that will certainly cut demand.” Jubak said. I am just not sure how long this global recession would last for, and hope not for long.
Source: